Splasm Software Discussions

a user community for the betterment of Splasmkind
It is currently Sun Feb 28, 2021 7:01 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Comments on work flow
PostPosted: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:19 pm 

Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:56 pm
Posts: 1
So far nice job. It imported Q, data flawlessly, balances match.

I really, really like the different balance options at the bottom of the register, particularly the ability to show the balance for only cleared transactions. It's a big time saver. Plus the ability to have instant reports on certain folders/categories is invaluable.

However, being set in my ways after being a Q user and its predecessor, Electronic Checkbook since 1988 (I have account files going back that far), I am not doing well with the differences in interface. I realize that they are your design choices, but they don't work well for me.

I'd far rather enter transactions directly into the check register. I understand that you have created a check stub metaphor, but it takes too many steps and more time, plus I have made errors. I'm sure the errors will diminish if I was to use it longer, but the extra steps and time spent will not.

The different colored rows for deposits and checks in the register really throws me. I turned them off, but now if I overdraw, it is not immdiately apparent. I prefer to keep the entries all black with a minus balance showing in red.

With the colors turned off, the difference between checks and deposits is not as obvious. In fact, it's a bit confusing (old eyes). Like in my old manual checkbook, I would far rather checks and deposits had their own columns.

Just one person's opinion...

Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Sun Dec 27, 2009 11:43 am 

Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:52 am
Posts: 20
I like the idea of colors matching balance rather than type. In MSMoney (sorry, I used it for years and do miss it!) there were two columns, one for + and one for -; this was a better solution to me than colors. I like the idea of "in the black" and "in the red" as I've seen others mention. The negative sign just isn't obvious enough. Even if it were to change to ($1.00) that would be more effective IMHO.

Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group